Thanks for your reply. Thought that it might had something to do with that DNS and DHCP going on between the two routers.
Yes I agree; this does seem counterintuitive to the idea of the piratebox, but right now I'm not really using it for it's intented purpose. No one logs onto my PB :( As you said, the insentive might be better if there's also "online internet" available. Some sort of access management might be needed, so that the PB owner can restricts its users to specific sites, ports to use etc.. Might be bad localtion (my flat), but I'm much in need of extending my wifi, so might as well use it for something usefull, rather than using it as a watt sucking brick :)
Yes I agree; this does seem counterintuitive to the idea of the piratebox, but right now I'm not really using it for it's intented purpose. No one logs onto my PB :( As you said, the insentive might be better if there's also "online internet" available. Some sort of access management might be needed, so that the PB owner can restricts its users to specific sites, ports to use etc.. Might be bad localtion (my flat), but I'm much in need of extending my wifi, so might as well use it for something usefull, rather than using it as a watt sucking brick :)